*For all intensive purposes, the IndyCar championship fight is over. When you consider Scott Dixon has won five races to Helio Castroneves' none, and 65 points is a lot to make up when Dixon has only twice finished outside the top four all season, the Brazilian's chances of his elusive first title are nil. Dixon nearly overcame a 65-point gap to Dario Franchitti last year but he had eight races to close it down, whereas Helio only has half that. Gentlemen, start your engraving...
*Paul Tracy's run to 4th was one of his best efforts the last three years. Driving a car for the first time, with a crew that hadn't doen pit stops since April, in a last-minute deal, Tracy made a number of fantastic moves while keeping his nose clean and earning Vision Racing's best result of the year. I originally viewed it as a mere PR stunt but hopefully this leads to more opportunities for PT in the future.
*The IndyCar Series schedule is due out tomorrow in all likelihood, given the timetables rumored the last few weeks, and an advisory on indycar.com's Up to Speed program some "big announcement" was coming in the next 24 hours. And no, it wasn't that Brett Favre has been traded, ending the month-long nightmare currently encapsulating the state of Wisconsin if not the entire football world. Not yet, at least.
*Finally, depending on what message boards you read, the IndyCar Series is either on the verge of some massive growth announcement or the brink of collapse altogether. Consider this - NASCAR's tire debacle at the Brickyard on Sunday could have far reaching effects beyond the farce it provided for the fans there. And it has a lot to do with power, something that all but killed open-wheel racing the last dozen years.
ESPN, NASCAR's bed partners now that they sold their souls to get back in the game of televising the 3400-lb billboard taxicabs, had one of their analysts Rusty Wallace blame the track for causing the tire issues, instead of Goodyear. The diamond-graining of the track's surface has not held up well to any rubber other than Bridgestone/Firestone, lest one forget the 2005 USGP when Michelin's unsafe tires caused their 14 cars to pull out. I was there and it was not a pleasant experience for my first, and to this point, only Grand Prix.
Put simply, Goodyear did not make a suitable tire for the event, just as they haven't at several other venues this season. They've been weeded out of open-wheel altogether and when a PR rep was asked if he could confirm this wouldn't happen again, he said simply, "No". That's consumer confidence for you.
Now what does this have to do with IndyCar, you ask? If NASCAR and/or its broadcast partner makes overtones to IMS that the track was the reason for the farce and not its own tire maker, what does Tony George do? TG isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, we all know that. And in part, his decision to allow NASCAR at the Speedway allowed the creation of the Indy Racing League in the first place and its catastrophic split of open-wheel.
One IndyCar Series, even with TG at the helm, is more of a threat to NASCAR's superiority complex that two was, and the divided fanbases could only help NASCAR for the last dozen years. If TG gives in to any NASCAR-issued demands, that could possibly impact the history of the track and the Indy 500 to suit NASCAR's benefit, he is only sacrificing himself and his open-wheel series, for the glory of the pre-eminent racing division in this country.
NASCAR's economy is bad but apparently so, too, is IndyCar's. The long rumors of a title sponsor paying $10 million for the rights now can apparently be had for half that according to a recent article in the Sports Business Journal online. And as number two on ESPN's pecking order, IndyCar has no negotiating rights other than the Indy 500, which apparently is all networks want to pay for. It's a case of, have Indy, and get the other races added on for grins and giggles.
ESPN is a catch-22 situation for IndyCar. Yes, it offers more exposure than any other major network because of the far-reaching avenues of coverage - three networks (ABC, ESPN, 2), ESPN.com, SportsCenter and the bottom line. But ESPN treats IndyCar as the unwanted stepchild, and for years has provided some of the most ill-produced and poor coverage, in terms of their on-air "talent" and production value. It's a losing proposition as it is, according to the ESPN execs.
The point of that long-winded diatribe was this: the ball is squarely in Tony George's court. He got what he wanted, which was control of all open-wheel racing. But only he can make decisions that will impact where IndyCar goes in the future, and those decisions will determine whether IndyCar even survives at all. By not standing his ground, TG loses what little modicum of dignity he has left.
IndyCar needs stability in terms of the driver lineup and sponsorship, and inspired direction in terms of its schedule and future chassis and engine combination. It needs a leader who will not give in to demands of its rival, which would only ensure its demise. It needs a TV contract that not only gives exposure and good production value, but also a marketing team that showcases what good IndyCar has to offer, not Gene Simmons.
Put simply, it needs Tony George to become something he hasn't been for the better part of the last twelve years.
A leader with backbone.